Pakistan's SNA

UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS

The SNA describes a coherent, consistent and integrated set of macroeconomic accounts in the context of a set of internationally agreed concepts, definitions, classifications and accounting rules.

Pakistan uses the 2008 version of the United Nations System of National Accounts. The 2008 version is the latest SNA framework available.

Data source: World Economics Research, London


Filter:
All
Africa
Asia Pacific
Americas
Europe
System of National Accounts (Version): All Countries SNA World Economics
Data Quality Rating
(A-E)



Algeria 2008 C
Argentina 2008 C
Armenia 2008 B
Australia 2008 A
Austria 2008 A
Bahamas, The 2008 B
Bahrain 2008 C
Belarus 2008 C
Belgium 2008 A
Benin 2008 C
Botswana 2008 C
Brazil 2008 B
Bulgaria 2008 B
Burkina Faso 2008 C
Cameroon 2008 D
Canada 2008 A
Chile 2008 A
China 2008 C
Colombia 2008 B
Comoros 2008 D
Costa Rica 2008 B
Cote d'Ivoire 2008 C
Croatia 2008 B
Cyprus 2008 A
Czechia 2008 A
Denmark 2008 A
Dominican Republic 2008 B
Ecuador 2008 D
El Salvador 2008 C
Estonia 2008 B
Eswatini 2008 D
Finland 2008 A
France 2008 A
Gambia 2008 D
Georgia 2008 B
Germany 2008 A
Ghana 2008 C
Greece 2008 B
Guatemala 2008 D
Haiti 2008 E
Hong Kong 2008 A
Hungary 2008 B
Iceland 2008 A
India 2008 C
Indonesia 2008 C
Ireland 2008 A
Israel 2008 A
Italy 2008 A
Japan 2008 A
Jordan 2008 B
Kenya 2008 D
Korea, Rep. 2008 A
Latvia 2008 B
Lebanon 2008 D
Lesotho 2008 C
Lithuania 2008 B
Luxembourg 2008 A
Malawi 2008 C
Malaysia 2008 B
Malta 2008 B
Mauritania 2008 D
Mauritius 2008 B
Mexico 2008 C
Moldova 2008 B
Mongolia 2008 B
Morocco 2008 C
Mozambique 2008 D
Myanmar 2008 D
Namibia 2008 C
Netherlands 2008 A
New Zealand 2008 A
Nicaragua 2008 D
Niger 2008 C
Nigeria 2008 E
North Macedonia 2008 B
Norway 2008 A
Oman 2008 B
Pakistan 2008 D
Paraguay 2008 D
Peru 2008 D
Philippines 2008 C
Poland 2008 B
Portugal 2008 A
Romania 2008 B
Russia 2008 C
Rwanda 2008 C
Saudi Arabia 2008 C
Senegal 2008 C
Serbia 2008 B
Sierra Leone 2008 D
Singapore 2008 A
Slovak Republic 2008 B
Slovenia 2008 A
South Africa 2008 B
Spain 2008 A
Sri Lanka 2008 C
Suriname 2008 C
Sweden 2008 A
Switzerland 2008 A
Taiwan 2008 A
Tanzania 2008 D
Togo 2008 C
Türkiye 2008 B
Turkmenistan 2008 D
Uganda 2008 D
Ukraine 2008 C
United Arab Emirates 2008 B
United Kingdom 2008 A
United States 2008 A
Uruguay 2008 B
Zambia 2008 D
Zimbabwe 2008 E
Afghanistan 1993 E
Albania 1993 C
Angola 1993 E
Azerbaijan 1993 D
Bangladesh 1993 E
Bhutan 1993 E
Bolivia 1993 E
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1993 D
Burundi 1993 E
Cambodia 1993 E
Central African Republic 1993 E
Chad 1993 E
Congo, Dem. Rep 1993 E
Congo, Rep. 1993 E
Egypt 1993 D
Ethiopia 1993 E
Gabon 1993 E
Guinea 1993 E
Guinea-Bissau 1993 E
Guyana 1993 E
Honduras 1993 E
Jamaica 1993 E
Kazakhstan 1993 D
Kuwait 1993 D
Kyrgyzstan 1993 D
Laos 1993 E
Liberia 1993 E
Libya 1993 E
Madagascar 1993 E
Mali 1993 E
Nepal 1993 E
Panama 1993 D
Papua New Guinea 1993 E
Qatar 1993 B
Tajikistan 1993 E
Thailand 1993 D
Tunisia 1993 D
Uzbekistan 1993 D
Vietnam 1993 E
Yemen, Rep. 1993 E
Sudan 1968 E



Data quality rating definitions:
         A: As good as it gets
         B: Good
         C: Use with caution
         D: Poor
         E: Extremely poor quality


See: Data for individual countries and underlying data click on the country name
Please read our Terms of Service and Disclaimer relating to data on this page.










PAKISTAN'S ECONOMICS
PAKISTAN'S DEMOGRAPHY
PAKISTAN'S ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL & GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC SOURCE & RELATED DATA

Share this Data

Share with Facebook Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Email